patching...
Breaking: Mehlville Grad, Oakville Resident to Ref Chelsea- Manchester City Match »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
In awe of the universe and addicted to life.

The Republican Party Will Not Win The White House, Again, in My Lifetime

I've been saying it now for 4-5 years, but now I am thoroughly convinced that the Republican Party will not win another election in my lifetime.  The 21st Century GOP has been taken over by millions of people who likely suffer from the Dunning-Kruger effect, where their lack of intelligence is so low that they don't realize how ignorant they really are - leading in turn to feelings of elevated superiority. 

Why am I so convinced?  I could list hundreds of examples, but I will just mention the most appalling and outrageous and most recent of all...GOP Convention attendees thowing peanuts at a black camerawoman from CNN and yelling, "This is how we feed the animals."

This almost can't even be real.  It's so strange, weird, or even an devilish 'Wizard of Oz' kind of reality.

I've known intuitively that the 21st Century GOP was not the party for me since at least 2002, but I've never been elevated to a level of abhorrence or revulsion until this very morning.

The GOP as a national party is officially over.  They can not survive in America except in pockets of loathing, malevolent ignorance.

There are certainly intelligent members of the Republican party left.  They exist all around the country and include some of my good friends, but their hopes and dreams for the rational platforms of their party on a national level are over, done - ancient history.

I see little-to-no chance for a rebirth.  The only viable alternative in my opinion is that the 21st Century GOP go the way of the Whigs and make way for a new conservative party, a rational libertarian party, perhaps.  There are good ideas on that side of the aisle, but they need room to breathe.  Instead, anything and everything that would lead to a likely solution to America's troubles in 2012 has been completely smothered by xenophobic, misogynistic, jingoistic, bigoted, theocratic, buffoonery.

I can't say I'm happy about it.  In all honesty I suffer certain level of melancholy in that the current state of the GOP leaves us unlikely to develop rational solutions to America's problems for the foreseeable future.  

While Congress doesn't have to agree on everything, they should at least come to a consensus that they will work rationally and in good faith to represent the health and the success of the entire population of this country.

With flying peanuts and the bewildering state of what it must be like to feel enlightened, and empowered, and superior - to be so accessible to unimaginative action by one political party - the GOP - saying, "This is how we feed the animals," I have little hope for our country's foreseeable future.

If anyone in the GOP really loves their country, they will disband and start over, but like I said, I'm not getting my hopes up that it will happen anytime soon...and especially not without a little violence.

Bob Franey

4:11 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Didnt Biden make a comment if the Republicans win blacks would be in chains and didnt Clinton say Obama would be carrying his luggage and fetching his cofee?

Just saying your double standard doesnt make sense

Are you better off than you were 4 years ago and the clear answer is no

Unemployment is up, No Budget, No Foreign Policy, No Energy Policy and No Leadership

NOBama in 2012

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karl Frank Jr.

4:29 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

No. Biden didn't say that.

And Clinton was just speaking the truth. If it wasn't for progress and the slowly developing moral maturation of this country, Obama would not be President.

His mother was single and on food-stamps, and it was because of Voting Laws and Civil Rights Laws and affirmative action that he was able to break through the barrier. However, he was not raised in abject poverty. His father and mother both died early and he was raised by his grandparents.

Yes. I am better off that I was 4 years ago.

Regardless, this is about how the 21st Century GOP as we know it is finished on a national scale.

There is no double-standard. There is a budget, but Congress won't act on it. Obama would have had to create 12 million jobs for Unemployment to be at 5%...not realistic with a do-nothing congress. He has an energy policy as well.

Either way, the Democrats could run their refrigerator and the GOP as we know it would not win another national election.

Comment_arrow

Mike Stevens

7:32 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Unfortunately Karl, there are far too many people who see absolutely no problem with how that camerawoman was treated. People who spew vitriol at the President because he's not a "good ol' white boy" who don't even pay attention to the rest of the country usually vote not based on issues but on emotions. I would love to think that the GOP, as it stands, would not win the presidency again, and hope that the GOP, and the Democrats, can both morph into something more than perpetual politicians who do and say anything to keep office, never vote with the consituents in mind and instead follow the lead of their party, and who refuse to agree on anything including a budget because, God forbid, that might make it look like one party was more successful than the other. We need term limits on all offices, we need to abolish lifetime pensions and insurance for congress, and we need people who don't do the political dance but instead focus on solving the tough issues while keeping constant eyes on the future. I don't think that type of politician exists, and if they do they just get swallowed up by the machines.

Comment_arrow

Karl Frank Jr.

8:40 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

I hear you Mike, but take 2008 for example, the only demographic that McCain carried was non-college educated white males. College education white males were 50/50. The GOP used to have hispanics until they blew that with walls and draconian immigration laws. And the GOP has gone way out of their way to remind women why they shouldn't be voting Republican.

I think the quality of politicians reflects the quality of the electorate. The people get the government they deserve...and those goes for the good as well as the bad.

It's just like Shawn Otto's science debates. Neither candidate will agree to a public forum on science because the electorate as a whole can't handle the nuanced discussion and the science that may be inconvenient to their dogma. So, even if the politicians know better, they can only act up to the level of their electorate...unless they are not only pragmatic, but creative and a little bit sly.

Like Lincoln said, "Good leaders take people where they want to go. Great leaders take people where they ought to go."

Larry Lazar

8:32 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Good post, as usual Karl, although I don't have the level of certainity that you have about the GOP never winning again.
It seems to me that an economic collapse, probably global, is quite plausible in the relatively near future (due to the instability in Europe and we have not fundamentally changed the systemic problems that resulted in the last crash)
Whoever is in the office at that particular point in time, which to your point will likely be Democrat, will probably take the hit in the subsequent election.

btw, I have a somewhat related post going in the Eureka Patch. You and your readers may want to check it out.

http://eureka-wildwood.patch.com/blog_posts/fears-of-a-nervous-moderate-part-2-of-5#c

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karl Frank Jr.

8:41 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Larry,

You are certainly right. If a disaster of those proportions were to occur, you may be right. In December of 2008 on CNN, George W. Bush said, "I had to abandon free market principles to save the free market."

"Save" is a big word in this context. Nassim Taleb and Benoit Mandelbrot are both on record saying that we are teetering and nothing significant has changed what is inevitable. Basically, we haven't learned our lesson.

Looking forward to reading your articles.

Bob Franey

9:59 am on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Karl

As usual dont let the fact get in the way of your bogus arguments that are not supported by fact. Barrack Obama has been a disaster for the economy and for America. Experts agree that given four more years of this could lead to an economic collapse around the world. Take off the rose colored glasses and see the world as it is today

“That’s why today, I’m pledging to cut the deficit we inherited by half by the end of my first term in office.”

Well, Obama doesn’t “have this done” three years later. Rather than restore economic vigor as promised, trillions of new dollars in wasteful deficit spending primarily benefitted his well-connected supporters such as labor bosses and environmental extremists, and slowed our natural cyclical recovery. His administration promised that his policies would cap unemployment at 8% all the way back in October 2009, and be down to near 6% today. Instead, we’ve remained above that 8% mark for the most consecutive months since the government began keeping records in the 1940s. At the same time Obama has raised the deficit higher than all sitting President before him.

Now explain how you could sign up for four more years of this. NoBama in 2012

Reply

Bob Franey

2:49 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Karl

As usual you make stuff up and deny the facts. Yes Biden did say that. I am not sure why people dont get a petition together to get you off patch.The community would be better served

Joe Biden appeared in Virginia before a group of supporters, a number of them African-American, and said this of Republican Mitt Romney: “He is going to let the big banks once again write their own rules, unchain Wall Street. He is going to put y'all back in chains."

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/15/joe-biden-s-chains-comment-and-the-racial-double-standard.html

Reply
Comment_arrow

PaulRevere

2:29 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Bob:
I am NOT in favor of Karl being knocked off the patch.
I am for "free-speech". Dems love that word "free". U-mm except when the speech explains the "cost of Liberalism".
Karl keeps front and center the reasons why all Americans and residents of his District are turning into the "NEW SLAVERY" for Government workers.

Karl will self-destruct himself.
I'm for Karl staying on as long as he wants.

Comment_arrow

Karl Frank Jr.

6:49 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Velar Puree,

Actually, I generally check my political feelings up against John Stuart Mills harm principle. "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harm_principle

Liberalism for me is a simple equation, or a state of mind based on a simple equation. (Original belief + Recent Objective Data = New Improved Belief)

Bob Franey

3:14 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

"Obama himself has recently claimed more job growth in the past 29 months than President George W. Bush created "during the entire seven years before this crisis."
"Despite incredible odds and united Republican opposition, our president took action, and now we've seen 4.5 million new jobs," San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro said in his keynote address at the DNC on Tuesday night.
That statistic was echoed by virtually all of Tuesday night's speakers, including first lady Michelle Obama, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who previously served as Obama's chief of staff.
However, CNN fact-checked that claim and found it to be "not the whole picture." Instead, CNN found that there has been a net increase of just 300,000 nonfarm payroll jobs since Obama took office. And if you count government jobs, there are actually 400,000 fewer people working today than in January 2009.
When Democrats use the 4.5 million jobs number, they're referring to jobs created after the economy bottomed out in January 2010, one year after Obama took office. That time frame excludes the worst job losses, which took place in 2009, and which many Democrats argue were the result of Bush policies.
CNN concludes: "The figure of 4.5 million jobs is accurate if you look at the most favorable period and category for the administration. But overall, there are still fewer people working now than when Obama took office at the height of the recession.""

Reply

Bob Franey

3:18 pm on Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Karl

No heart attack at all this is easy especially when you make up lies and dont accept the facts you have so much to do you have only posted like 40 times on facebook

Reply

Ron Sheppard

11:20 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Bob,

You forgot that Clinton and the democratic controlled house and senate signed our country away, by allowing NAFTA and China into the WTO. Bill Clinton claimed that allowing China will create billions of dollars in trade surplus going to China.(it is funny how when that happened somehow some chinese people donated 30 million dollars to Bill Clinton's library) Since then all the jobs that use to be in America went to Mexico and now even those jobs are in China. I had one of my customers, Delphi, tell me that they wanted a new machine for automotive production but they didnt want the language in Spanish, they wanted it in Chinese.

We need somebody to run this country like Ross Perot would have, not a democrat not a republican, but a business person.

Reply
Comment_arrow

PaulRevere

2:02 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

RON:
Welcome on board. Nice comment.
Spread this news on all Patch states.
It's time business drown out the "public service mentality" in this USA.
Unless that is done, business will be treated as "NON-PEOPLE"
Do you see my point here.
The DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS OUT TO RE_DEFINE BUSINESSES (CORPORATIONS).
This "Corporations are not People" is a Hidden agenda.

Karl Frank Jr.

3:47 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Bob, you say, "Experts agree that given four more years of this could lead to an economic collapse around the world."

Can you cite your source?

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

4:00 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Bob,

The trough of the Great Recession was in January of 2010. Since then, Obama's policies have added 4.5 million jobs back to private industry.

Unemployment is a lagging indicator. Source: http://goo.gl/6RsVf

Obama would have had to create 12 million private sector jobs to have the unemployment rate down to 5% and 20+ million by the end of 2016.

Bush admitted the magnitude of the failed economy when he said in December of 2008, "I had to abandon free market principles to save the free market system." - Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1G2Jyvpje8

Bob, Biden did not say as you said above: "Didnt Biden make a comment if the Republicans win blacks would be in chains."

On healthcare, Obamacare extends coverage to 30 million more people and millions of lives will be saved over the years and the quality of life for millions will be better overall. Until you actually have some information that debunks that, then it doesn't really matter what you say about it. Here is a timeline of what has been enacted, and what is yet to come: http://goo.gl/ZE1I

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

4:01 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

But the bottom line is that the Democrats could run their refridgerator against the GOP and the GOP would still lose. They are finished nationally unless something completely unpredictable happens. They've lost the country as a whole. That's the point of this post.

Reply

Bob Franey

4:24 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Karl read the facts and weep this is why you have zero credibility in the community
You must be smoking the same thing Clinton was last night I think they refer to it as wacky weed because my friend you are past wacky

Oh by the way read and weep NoBama in2012

http://mehlville-oakville.patch.com/articles/patch-democrats-polled-barack-obama-would-not-carry-missouri

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

4:29 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Bob,

As I said in the article:

"The GOP as a national party is officially over. They can not survive in America except in pockets of loathing, malevolent ignorance."

Missouri is one of those pockets...However, if he wasn't black and didn't have the middle name Hussein, then who knows. Missouri did vote for Bill Clinton if I remember correctly.

Reply

PaulRevere

7:00 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Karl:
I actually agree with your analysis. A bit premature to say "Nationally"
Quite concise on "republican" party today.
It will evolve and take (some?) time. Another pre-election debt downgrade must be factored in.
Another factor is if the "Obama-Health-Tax" kills the economy in 2 years. I just commented on School district 100% medical Ins increase.
A National dislike in future tax increases are possible.
It's one thing to hide the obama-TAX in prices, but not Real Estate Taxes.

Reply

Bob Franey

9:46 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Karl
Why is it that you never speak to the facts. Is it because there is no denying the truth and in your make believe world it is far better to make stuff up than admit the facts.?
1) Even though Obama says he has created all these jobs the unemployment rate is higher today than 4 years ago when he took office
2) Under Obama the Deficit has grown faster than all previous Presidents combined
3) The lack of an Energy Policy has created gas prices that are double what they were when Obama took Office.
4) The middle class that Obama says his Presidency is all about has seen their median income drop by 10%
5) In 4 Years in Office has failed to adopt a budget period, balanced or oherwise
6) Has failed to develop a foreign policy that embraces our allies and strengthens world peace. Instead he has embraced the muslim world and considers to funnel money to his muslim friends who donate millions to his campaign
7) Although the affordable health care act has provisions we would all agree are good. Obama has forced thru the single biggest expansion of government that all would agree will saddle us with more massive debt, regulation and bureaucratic red tape that will prove to be as inefficient as any other government agency ie the post office, social security medicare
8) As with the Mehlville School District Health Care premiums continue to rise to astronomical proportions thus reducing spendable income and shifting the burden to the individual taxpayer.
Out of touch Karl

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

7:00 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Bob,

You never cited your source from above when you said, "Experts agree that given four more years of this could lead to an economic collapse around the world."

1. Since you haven't figured it out yet, I'll let everyone else know who might be reading. The unemployment rate remains high because every year millions of new people enter the workforce while millions of others have lost their retirement. So, in order to have unemployment down to 5%, he would have had to added 12 billion jobs. Impossible with the GOP Party of No doing nothing in Congress. They put the bill on his desk and will sign it.

2. The deficit didn't happen in a vacuum. For anyone who is interested, you can start with the end of year numbers in 2000 and then look at the end of year numbers all the way through now. It's very clear were the deficit comes from. Not the least of which is that we ran two wars on borrowed money with interest that has come due.

3. He has an energy policy, but Congress won't do anything about it.

4. You are right, thanks to the Great Recession of 2007 that troughed in January of 2007.

5. He has a budget, but Congress has to pass the budget, and they won't. They refuse to. It's not a dictatorship.

6. His foreign policy has been awesome in my opinion, and what you say is merely opinion.

7. I love Obamacare.

8. I was on the board can inform you that healthcare costs were rising 3 x's the rate of inflation as far back as 2005 and was only increasing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

PaulRevere

1:26 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Karl:
Here are the Googled facts about USA Debt.
My, are you uninformed!
Remember "deficits" are not "debt"
Annual income less outgo =Deficit. Total borrowings = DEBT
It's the $16 trillion DEBT that is our problem.
USA has $3T income and spends $4T for the past 4 years only.=losing $1tr year.

$16T Natl Debt is made up of 2 types.
Public Debt $11.2tr
IntraGov 4.8tr
Total debt $16T
It's the Public debt that congress basically control. That's the accum of their budget overspendings.
HISTORY of Public Debt 1970=$1tr 1980=$2.6T 1988=$5.1T 1992=$6.3TBush 1
2000=$5.6T Clinton
2008=$6.3T +$4.3T=$10.4T Bush2
2012=$11.2T +$4.8T=$16T Obama
Obama is losing $1T every year because he does nothing about "demanding" congress "CUT". A moral victory of increasing taxes on Millionairres will get $peanuts to annual $4tr spending.
Obama is Giving borrowed money away.
People who accept jobs have taken 25% pay cuts to get back in.
And that is why You are ignorant of how the job market works.
School boards can easily Tax their pay increases.
Businesses need more customers and products to give pay increases.
Google the rise in insurance and you will see that the "main" reasons are Obma's Health TAX coming down on all Americans.
3X the rate of inflation is maybe 6% in the past 7 years. 100% increases in most medical plans is robbery by "The Administration"
Your conclusions Are not even close to business conclusions.

Karl Frank Jr.

7:00 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

12 million jobs, not billion...whoops. :)

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

7:29 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Bob,

You still didn't provide your source for "Experts agree that given four more years of this could lead to an economic collapse around the world." I guess that was just baseless hyperbole?

Also, here is a fully sourced list of Obama's Achievements...and it doesn't include all of them. I'm very happy with him and can't wait to vote for him again.

Either way, the 21st GOP is done in my lifetime on a national level. Obama or no Obama....

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

6:52 am on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Happy Birthday Bob! As of September 8, 2012, the 21st Century GOP has been blocking the American Jobs Act for a whole year. For 29 months Jobs created by Obama policies, 4.5 million ---- Jobs created by Congressional Republicans - 0.

Reply
Comment_arrow

PaulRevere

2:22 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Karl:
4.5 million jobs "created"
1) Would you care commenting on where those jobs were created.?

2) Would you also like to comment on the electrician who was unemployed in Jan2009, and now working for Anheuser Busch as their in-house maintenance at less pay, is a Job created by Obama?

3) Are you aware that the 4.5 million jobs that Obama takes credit for creating were layoff's and downsizings. Over 3million of those 4.5 million jobs that are Obama claimed are simply returning employees AT LESSER PAY.
A bunch of Baloney that puts an exclamation point to ---obma taking credit for Killing OBL. Did Obama INHERIT the greatest Military in the world? Or Did Obama also CREATE the greatest military in the world.
Please give this country a break and stop offending the intelligence level of others who understand that a CREATOR is someone greater than Obama.
I await your response to let us all know the 4.5 jobs "Created" by Your "CREATOR".

PaulRevere

1:51 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Corporations "ARE" people.
Why? Corporations:
1) Have checking accnts.
2) Can be sued
3) Can sue
4) Pay taxes PAY TAXES! PAY TAXES! (well sometimes)
5) Are 'born" (articles by the people stockholders)
6) Are "aborted" (by stopping business)
6a) Can file BANKRUPTCY like people.
7) can Die ( by dissolution)
8) Get sick-- (that's losing money some years)
9) can gamble (develop new products)
9a) Can sign CONTRACTS. Like people.
9b) Can hire lawyers.
10) can own cars
11) can buy medical insurance
12) pay bills---Can invest in stocks--can own computers--

YEP! So next time Biden says: GM LIVES! remember that's WHAT PEOPLE DO.
I guess Biden agrees that GM LIVES! (It has a "life" like people-persons)

Obama "Resurrected" GM from the Dead. !!!!!
The "Messiah" has certainly proved that-- GM (A Corporation) is a Person-PEOPLE coming back from the Dead..
(he saved millions of "people" jobs by the many Corporations doing business with GM). ( Catholics believe in 3 persons in one GOD-- so is GM millions of "Person's" in one CORPORATION?

One more thing , any one person self-employed or (Corporation) is a "PERSON"
Geez-Democrats love re-defining America. It shows on every thing they say.

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

2:20 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

oh. Sorry. Still waiting for my invitation to my first corporate wedding.

Reply
Comment_arrow

PaulRevere

3:15 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

KARL:
Yes! A Corporate wedding is called "A MERGER"
Marriages Between a (steelmill-steelmill), (CornFlake-FrostedFlake)
Group marriages between (Apple-Ipad-netflix)
WOW! Coporations are Democrats!!!!!

Comment_arrow

Karl Frank Jr.

3:16 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

So, you are for gay marriage then? Can I marry Coca-Cola and file a tax return as married?

Comment_arrow

PaulRevere

3:18 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Karl:
Your response (rebuttal) to my Corporations are Persons is deafening!
You Must agree--Right?
Can you admit that? Or will you defend Biden? Which is it.

Comment_arrow

PaulRevere

3:23 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Karl:
When you admit that corporations are "PERSONS", I will answer the gay marriage
question.

Comment_arrow

PaulRevere

3:31 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Karl:
I will also answer the coca-cola question.
It's just that for you to be citing the "relationships" between 2 persons as the start is wrong. DO YOU ADMIT THAT CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE to carry on into their relations, and I will proceed. It is interesting that anyone would try to differentiate
TAXPAYERS. Prepare to be enlightened. As I believe you are down for the count.

Comment_arrow

Karl Frank Jr.

3:32 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Well, when corporations start appearing from the uterus of a woman, I will admit they are persons.

Karl Frank Jr.

2:27 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

I will when I get back home and am not driving. Macroeconomic policy affects everyone from the CEO to the unemployed to the custodian to the bus driver to the small business owner of which I am 1.

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

3:20 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Sorry, but unless a corporation comes out of a woman's vulva it is not a person.

Reply

PaulRevere

3:48 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

People hear this!
Karl will not support his own party's DNC claim that "corporations" are not people.
No-where did the party claim that Corporations are not people only because Corporation's were not born out of a "Woman's Uterus".
Yet , that is Karl's last line of defense.
Sounds like you lose Karl!
Better call your Biden's and DNC lady who proclaimed everything I rebutted.

Better tell them to "ADD WOMAN CREATE PERSON's INTO THEIR PLATFORM"
Because that is exactly what you say is a "Person"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karl Frank Jr.

3:56 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

It's not my last line of defense. It's my bottom line of defense. Until a corporation emerges from the uterus of a woman, it's not a person. It doesn't get any simpler or more bottom line than that.

Comment_arrow

PaulRevere

5:12 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Karl:
"Human Beings" That's what comes from a Woman.
Karl: The DNC did not establish that and you know it.
I gave you many "exact" legal comparisons & characteristics of "Corporations" and People. (Corporations is defined as "A group of People" that's in the dictionary.
Their rights established by laws.

I believe that any Human born in this world has "GOD GIVEN RIGHTS" as opposed to people Law given rights. That is where your bottom line defense is crushed.
Again, your attempt to re-define nature to make a simple case , that a Corporation is not a "legal person" is ludicrous. So you simply avoid the many comparisons to what a person & Corporation represents in America,
Again, you agree that the (13) points I made about Corporations and people ARE
irrefutable. You just want to add another final "Woman uterus" discussion.
I am certain you would than want to enter the "Creator" argument all over.
I raise my hand in victory until the DNC wants to adopt your bottom line.

Karl Frank Jr.

9:34 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Pleura Ever,

Human Beings and People and Person's are the same thing. Let me know the next time there is a missing person Amber alert out for Ford.

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

9:36 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

I'm with MovetoAmend.org and especially Justice Stevens' dissent.

We the People, Not We the Corporations

On January 21, 2010, with its ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are persons, entitled by the U.S. Constitution to buy elections and run our government. Human beings are people; corporations are legal fictions.

We, the People of the United States of America, reject the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United, and move to amend our Constitution to firmly establish that money is not speech, and that human beings, not corporations, are persons entitled to constitutional rights.

The Supreme Court is misguided in principle, and wrong on the law. In a democracy, the people rule.

We Move to Amend.

". . . corporations have no consciences, no beliefs, no feelings, no thoughts, no desires. Corporations help structure and facilitate the activities of human beings, to be sure, and their 'personhood' often serves as a useful legal fiction. But they are not themselves members of “We the People” by whom and for whom our Constitution was established."
~Supreme Court Justice Stevens, January 2010

Reply

Mike Stevens

8:41 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

The troubles lie with the fact that there are only 2 major parties to choose from, and the differences between the 2 are so stark that there is no middle ground between them. If Republicans believe the Moon is made of cheese, Democrats will believe that the Moon is made of whipped cream. If Democrats like something, Republicans automatically hate it. Two party systems, and party systems in general, were not something the founding fathers wanted:
Contrary to popular belief, the two-party system is not institutionalized in the Constitution. In fact, most of the delegates at the Constitutional Convention were hostile to the idea of political parties. George Washington worried about the “baneful effects of the spirit of party” would have on the young Republic. Thomas Jefferson was more blunt in his criticism: “If I could not go to heaven but with a party, I would not go there at all.”

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karl Frank Jr.

8:58 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

That is true...but they all evolved into two parties very quickly. When I was in polisci, one of the things my professor said is that the way our Constitution is written and our government is set up, it is only possible for two parties to exist. It has to do with the percentage of votes needed to pass anything.

Third parties just split up existing factions making them both ineffective. In America you will always have a more liberal party and a more conservative party. The populace will always have opinions on issues that fall on both sides.

Major candidates almost always run their primaries to their base and then their general elections to the middle.

The problem in this case is that our two party system has pretty much become one party of white people and another party of everyone, including white people. Of course both parties used to be all white males...so it would make sense for the conservative party to be the one of all white males.

It's like Custard's Last Stand.

Mike Stevens

8:58 am on Sunday, September 9, 2012

More from the Founding Fathers:
John Adams said:

There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.
George Washington agreed, saying in his farewell presidential speech: The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism.
The Founders were republicans. No, not George Bush or John McCain Republicans; they were philosophical republicans (with a small "r"). This meant they believed that successful representative governments required the subordination of individual personal interests to the welfare of the community. They believed that the political process was all about identifying the common good. It was not about competition and disagreement; politics was a process in which rational voters and officials calmly sorted out what best served the entire community. The end result was not one camp of winners and another of losers, but the entire electorate united behind a common vision.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karl Frank Jr.

10:02 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

This is true, but Adams and Jefferson split right away into two parties. It was the long middle to their friendship that went terribly. Of course, they became friends again in the end...dying on the same day; July 4th nonetheless...I think.

Karl Frank Jr.

9:57 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012

"I read Charles Koch's op-ed as I was finishing a new book called "The Party is Over," by Mike Lofgren, who spent 30 years as a Republican committee staffer in the U.S. House of Representatives. He bailed last year, having decided his party had gone crazy...His first move was to write a blistering essay for Truth-out.org....The book (subtitle, "How Republicans Went Crazy, Democrats Became Useless and the Middle Class Got Shafted") expands on that essay....I would like to urge you to stop reading this column and look up Lofgren's essay. Or go to your favorite bookstore and buy "The Party is Over."

http://www.stltoday.com/news/opinion/columns/kevin-horrigan/horrigan-one-party-s-gone-crazy-the-other-s-gone/article_67a9ccae-0d0f-5cc7-b4bf-efd17ccba32b.html

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

9:59 am on Sunday, September 16, 2012

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." Rick Santorum

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

7:28 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Biologist PZ Myers had a good idea to keep the Republican Party viable:

http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/09/21/i-just-realized-how-the-republicans-can-win-me-over/

"That’ll never work. Hispanics aren’t going to see him as a friend no matter how much spray-on tan he puts on.

But then I had a thought. What the Republicans need to do is increase the supply of cranky old white men. How can they do that? Longevity research! Pour more money into the NIH for work that keeps old people alive for longer…especially that favorite subject of biomedical research, the white male. It’s a win:win! More money for science, more cranky old white men voting longer, more cranky old white men feeling obligated to the Republican party, more medical benefits that assist me as I get older.

I don’t see why they aren’t rushing to adopt this strategy. It’s their only hope."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Burt Zerker

9:24 pm on Sunday, October 7, 2012

You're White and yet you hate White people. I can't imagine what terrible thing that must have happened to you. Where does all that self loathing come from? Carrying around your 'Whiteness' must be an awful shame and burden on you Karl.

Karl Frank Jr.

8:28 am on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Brooks has been an interesting fellow to watch over the years. He is precisely the kind of intellectual conservative that has been marginalized by the "Ignorance as a Value" power structure of the GOP. Here is his op-ed in the NYT

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/25/opinion/brooks-the-conservative-mind.html?_r=2

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

1:49 am on Wednesday, November 7, 2012

"Democrats maintained an edge in party identification, allowing Mr. Obama to win despite losing independent voters by several points. Forty-five percent of those who voted for Mr. Obama were racial minorities, a record number, and he made gains among Hispanic and Asian-American voters.

Mr. Obama’s win carried forth into most of the swing states. Of the 10 states that the campaigns contested most vigorously, he may lose only North Carolina, while winning battlegrounds in the four major geographic regions of the country.

Mr. Obama is also likely to win the popular vote, perhaps by two to three percentage points, once votes from California, Oregon and Washington are fully counted." - Nate Silver from fivethirtyeight.com

Reply

Karl Frank Jr.

10:43 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Here is Lee Atwater on how the GOP can win over racists voters without sounding racist themselves: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=X_8E3ENrKrQ

Reply

Leave a comment